Six tools for one review
Reference managers, screening apps, extraction spreadsheets, stats software, writing platforms. Context lost at every handoff.
From research question to publication-ready figures — without jumping between six different tools. Import, screen, extract, analyze, and report on a single auditable platform.
Researchers stitch together reference managers, screening apps, extraction spreadsheets and stats software. Every handoff loses context.
Reference managers, screening apps, extraction spreadsheets, stats software, writing platforms. Context lost at every handoff.
Decisions live in different files. Audit trails break across tools. Methodology becomes hard to reproduce.
Exporting CSVs, reformatting data, reconciling versions. Time that should be spent on analysis.
From framing your research question to exporting publication-ready figures. No tool-switching. No broken audit trails.
Because our implementation is auditable, reproducible, and grounded in published methodology.
Screening follows the decision criteria used by leading systematic review frameworks. Every prompt is inspectable and every decision exportable — you can publish the methodology alongside your review.
# screening prompt (excerpt) "Decide whether the study meets the pre-specified eligibility criteria. If insufficient information is available in the title and abstract, mark as UNCLEAR and defer to full-text."
Token usage, model version, timestamp, justification — logged per decision and exported as structured JSON, ready for peer review.
Powered by Anthropic’s Claude, built with careful prompt engineering and model selection for each stage. Cost-optimized without compromising on quality.
GDPR & LGPD compliant. Your data is never used for model training. Each project runs in an isolated database context.
Free to explore. Pay for real usage, no surprises.
For exploring & teaching reviews.
For teams shipping reviews regularly.
For institutions, hospitals, pharma.
No credit card. Cancel anytime.